Amyloidosis and Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Surgical Technique for Extended Carpal Tunnel Release with Tenosynovium and Transverse Carpal Ligament Biopsies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is common in patients with transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR), and many experience residual symptoms and/or develop recurrent disease following routine carpal tunnel release (CTR). An extended CTR with median nerve neurolysis is recommended for thorough nerve decompression. Tissue confirmation of amyloidosis can be performed at the time of CTR with biopsies of the transverse carpal ligament and/or tenosynovium. Methods: We describe a retrospective, single-center experience performing an extended CTR technique including unilateral and bilateral cases for 13 consecutive patients (18 wrists) with ATTR and symptomatic median neuropathy at the wrist. Results: The mean patient age was 83 (range 67-90) years and 11 (85%) were men. Notable intraoperative findings in all cases included thickened tenosynovium and median nerve epineurium, and adherence of the median nerve to the deep surface of transverse carpal ligament. Pathology findings were positive for amyloidosis from both the transverse carpal ligament and the tenosynovium biopsies in all patients. Conclusions: Extended CTR with simultaneous wrist tissue biopsy can be safely performed for ATTR patients with CTS. Characteristic intraoperative findings should increase clinical suspicion for undiagnosed ATTR and prompt performance of biopsy for diagnostic confirmation. Volar wrist tenosynovial biopsy is our preferred tissue for confirmation of ATTR, for patients with and without CTS, given its safety profile and 100% pathological yield in our series.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".