MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4317908161 · doi:10.31219/osf.io/qf5hr

Pengantar Teori Pembangunan

2023· preprint· id· W4317908161 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSMEs Development and Digital Marketing
Canadian institutionsHatch (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kemuculan teori pembangunan tidak dapat dilepaskan dari kepentingan dan konteks sosial yang berpengaruh besar pada zaman tersebut. Teori pembangunan merupakan serangkaian teori yang digunakan sebagai acuan membangun masyarakat. Dalam perkembangannya, beragam pendekatan muncul dalam teori pembangunan yang kemudian saling memberikan kritik satu dengan yang lain. Awalnya pembangunan dipandang hanya sebagai fenomena ekonomi saja. Namun, banyak negara yang mulai menyadari bahwa pertumbuhan (growth) tidak identik dengan pembangunan (development). Pembangunan ekonomi yang mulanya hanya diukur dari prestasi kuantitatif semata, selanjutnya juga memperhatikan peningkatan kesejahteraan masyarakat secara lebih kompleks. Pembangunan pada akhirnya menuntut pemusatan perhatian pada hal-hal yang lebih daripada sekedar sisi material.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.361
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSMEs Development and Digital MarketingFrench-language works237,207