MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Barnahouse – center for children who have suffered from violence: general characteristics and implementation in Ukraine

2022· article· en· W4317929014 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
N. Bondarenko

Bibliographic record

VenueHumanitarian studios pedagogics psychology philosophy · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMilitary, Security, and Education Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChild abuseInterviewMental healthChild sexual abuseSocial workEconomic JusticeQuarter (Canadian coin)PsychologyPsychiatryCriminologySexual abuseMedicinePolitical scienceSuicide preventionPoison controlMedical emergencyLawGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The problem of violence against children is worldwide. According to data from the World Health Organization, child abuse is a global problem with serious lifelong consequences. According to statistics, a quarter of all adults were physically abused as children. One in five women and one in 13 men reported sexual violence and abuse as a child. The consequences of child abuse have a serious impact on physical and mental health throughout life, and its social and professional productivity can slow down the economic and social development of a country over time, and therefore reflect on the mental health of the entire society. In Ukraine, the problem of violence against children is quite acute. The urgency of the painful topic for society is that this issue is complex, unpredictable and difficult to solve. When a child is maltreated, a number of different actors, including. To date, such subjects as social services, medical institutions, justice bodies, prosecutor's office and judges, who are obliged to promote the observance of the rights of the child and act in the best way in his interests, do not always work in harmony. : the child goes through several institutions and is repeatedly interviewed by different specialists, in different places, is exposed to different methods of collecting information. Moving a child between different institutions and departments for the purpose of interviewing and describing the situation related to violence against him causes retraumatization (revictimization) of the child. She relives the same fears she faced. Such multiple interviews of the child in different places and institutions, which are often conducted without using approaches that are understandable to him, lead to his repeated traumatization (victimization), as a result of which the results of the interviews differ from each other, because very often the testimony of the child as a witness or victim can be distorted or discredited. Research has shown that such re-victimization can actually cause more harm to a child than the abuse itself. In addition, repeated interrogations carried out by people who have not undergone special training can distort the child's story about the events through suggestion and negatively affect the course of the investigation of the criminal case. Children who have suffered or become victims of violence or other illegal actions, during the preliminary investigation and pre-trial proceedings, need to apply appropriate measures, receive complex and coordinated services and support. Therefore, recently, more and more often, scientists talk about the need to introduce interdepartmental and interdisciplinary cooperation in combination with the use of special techniques and methods of interviewing the child as a decisive step in protecting the rights of children who have suffered as a result of criminal acts and children who have witnessed abuse and violence. It is also important that the participants in the process are fully aware of how their actions will affect the child, i.e. ensuring the rights of the child should be a priority. This requires the responsibility and active participation of all organizations involved in this process. In different countries, different types of services of interdisciplinary and interagency structures are implemented - depending on the legal system, social structure, cultural traditions, etc. In some states, integral complexes of interdepartmental and interdisciplinary cooperation are gradually being formed according to certain models. However, to date, one of the most effective models of interdepartmental and interdisciplinary cooperation is the world-proven Barnahus model (hereinafter - "Barnachus"). Today, the model is recognized as a best practice for protecting children from violence and dealing with the consequences of violence that a child has experienced. The obtained results of the research consist in the analysis of the "Barnachus" model in Ukraine. The article outlines the basic understanding of the Barnahus model, defines Barnahus quality standards, which are required by the legislative basis for the operation of the model and its implementation in Ukraine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.082

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHumanitarian studios pedagogics psychology philosophySame topicMilitary, Security, and Education StudiesFrench-language works237,207