Semi-Self-Supervised Learning for Semantic Segmentation in Images with Dense Patterns
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deep learning has shown potential in domains with large-scale annotated datasets. However, manual annotation is expensive, time-consuming, and tedious. Pixel-level annotations are particularly costly for semantic segmentation in images with dense irregular patterns of object instances, such as in plant images. In this work, we propose a method for developing high-performing deep learning models for semantic segmentation of such images utilizing little manual annotation. As a use case, we focus on wheat head segmentation. We synthesize a computationally annotated dataset-using a few annotated images, a short unannotated video clip of a wheat field, and several video clips with no wheat-to train a customized U-Net model. Considering the distribution shift between the synthesized and real images, we apply three domain adaptation steps to gradually bridge the domain gap. Only using two annotated images, we achieved a Dice score of 0.89 on the internal test set. When further evaluated on a diverse external dataset collected from 18 different domains across five countries, this model achieved a Dice score of 0.73. To expose the model to images from different growth stages and environmental conditions, we incorporated two annotated images from each of the 18 domains to further fine-tune the model. This increased the Dice score to 0.91. The result highlights the utility of the proposed approach in the absence of large-annotated datasets. Although our use case is wheat head segmentation, the proposed approach can be extended to other segmentation tasks with similar characteristics of irregularly repeating patterns of object instances.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it