MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4317931348 · doi:10.4000/12wi5

L’écriture pionnière de l’« éthique de la terre » dans Bêtes de la Brousse de René Maran

2022· preprint· fr· W4317931348 on OpenAlexaff
Sylvie Brodziak

Bibliographic record

VenueArchipélies · 2022
Typepreprint
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEcocriticism and Environmental Literature
Canadian institutionsCanadian Heritage
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Publié en 1941, en un temps où la crise climatique était non identifiée et la réflexion écologique quasi inexistante, le recueil de contes Bêtes de la Brousse propose une écriture originale de l’animalité et nous invite à penser la nature en termes de coexistence et d’interdépendance, à interroger l’alliance de l’humain avec le vivant. Tout en s’inscrivant dans la tradition de la fable animalière, cette suite de quatre contes est traversée par l’éthique du bon usage de la nature, dans la lignée de l’écrivain, naturaliste et philosophe Henry David Thoreau au xixe siècle, et de la grande figure de l’écologie américaine, Aldo Leopold, mort en 1948.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.096

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.008
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchipéliesSame topicEcocriticism and Environmental LiteratureFrench-language works237,207