MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4317933439 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.06432

Study of a coaxial vacuum arc thruster plume and its interaction with applied magnetic field

2025· preprint· en· W4317933439 on OpenAlex
M. Jimenez Diaz, Laurent Garrigues, Gerjan Hagelaar, Freddy Gaboriau, Laurent Liard, Vı́ctor J. Herrero, A. Blanchet

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueArXiv.org · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicVacuum and Plasma Arcs
Canadian institutionsWorkplace Health, Safety and Compensation Commission
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVacuum arcCoaxialPlumeArc (geometry)Magnetic fieldAerospace engineeringField (mathematics)PhysicsMechanicsMaterials scienceElectrical engineeringMechanical engineeringEngineeringPlasmaMeteorologyNuclear physicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A hybrid model where ions are treated as particles and electrons with fluid equations for magnetized electron flux is adapted in order to simulate a vacuum arc source. This source is a candidate for solid propellant propulsion system of micro- and nano-satellites. We show preliminary results of the plume and interelectrode region properties with and without the influence of an imposed magnetic field. We compare the results with experimental data, and we find that the magnetic collimation is overestimated in the simulation

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score0.886

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it