A North American, single-center experience implanting fenestrated atrial devices and atrial flow regulators into a heterogeneous group of pediatric pulmonary hypertension patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: The clinical deterioration commonly experienced by pediatric patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) has motivated a shift in the treatment of pulmonary hypertension (PH) through innovations in surgical salvage interventions. The Occlutech fenestrated atrial septal defect (FASD) Occluder and the atrial flow regulator (AFR), which provides a protective, atrial-level shunt during hypertensive crises, have found an important role in treating pediatric patients with PAH. Other groups of pediatric patients with PH may also benefit from a similar protective physiology. The primary aim of this work is to present a single center's experience with AFR and FASD devices for managing a heterogeneous group of pediatric PH patients. A secondary goal is to identify hemodynamic changes and complications following device implantation. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all pediatric PH patients who, after being found suitable, either successfully or unsuccessfully received an FASD or AFR device between January 2015 and December 2021 at the Stollery Children's Hospital in Edmonton, Canada. Results: underwent device implantation: five received FASDs, eight received AFRs, and one was ultimately unable to receive an implant due to thrombosed iliac vessels and required surgical intervention. Of the fourteen patients, seven were in group 1 (PAH), one was in group 3 (lung disease), and six were in group 5 (primarily pulmonary hypertension vascular disease) under the World Symposium PH classification. All patients were on mono-, dual-, or triple-drug PH therapy. Device stabilization was not possible for two patients, who then required a repeat catheterization. Of the group 1 patients, three AFR and three FASD implants were successful, while one FASD implant was unsuccessful due to thrombosed vessels. At a six-month clinical assessment, all group 1 patients had patent devices and improved WHO FCs. Conclusion: This work presents a single center's experience with AFR and FASD implants in a heterogeneous group of fourteen pediatric patients with severe PH. This treatment strategy is novel in the pediatric population and so this work provides momentum for future studies of interventional cardiac catheterization procedures for pediatric patients with PH. Further collaborations are required to develop criteria to identify ideal pediatric candidates and optimally time interventions in order to maximize the benefits of this treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".