MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4317938354 · doi:10.1016/j.xpro.2023.102062

Click-chemistry-based protocol to quantitatively assess fatty acid uptake by Mycobacterium tuberculosis in axenic culture and inside mouse macrophages

2023· article· en· W4317938354 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Thomas Laval, Caroline Demangel

Bibliographic record

VenueSTAR Protocols · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistère de l'Enseignement supérieur, de la Recherche et de l'InnovationInstitut PasteurFondation pour la Recherche MédicaleInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale
KeywordsAxenicClick chemistryMycobacterium tuberculosisFlow cytometryChemistryFluorescence microscopeFluorescenceTuberculosisMicrobiologyBiologyBiochemistryCell biologyBacteriaMolecular biologyCombinatorial chemistryMedicineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) hijacks host-derived fatty acids (FAs) to sustain its intracellular growth inside host cells. Here, we present a click-chemistry-based protocol to assess FA import by Mtb in axenic culture or inside mouse macrophages. We describe the use of alkyne analogs of natural FAs as an alternative to structurally altered fluorescent derivatives or hazardous radiolabeled FAs. We also detail quantitative analyses of FA uptake at single bacterial or host cell level by flow cytometry and confocal fluorescence microscopy. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Laval et al. (2021).1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSTAR ProtocolsSame topicTuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207