Optimal Design of a Surface Precipitation Network in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The surface precipitation network in Canada suffers from large data gaps due to the challenge of covering a large country with a low population density. A proof-of-concept for an optimal network design is proposed to more efficiently estimate precipitation in Canada with the design goal of minimizing the interpolation uncertainty. The network design is based on a statistical model of precipitation that accounts for intermittency and non-Gaussianity of precipitation. Our results indicate that the greatest needs for new stations are in British Columbia, where coastal and mountain climate leads to more uncertainty in precipitation amounts, while the Prairie Provinces (Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba) could gain efficiencies by reducing their network size. Despite the current low density of stations in the territories north of Canada, these drier and colder regions only have a moderate need for more stations, mostly in the mountainous regions of Yukon. However, from a spatially varying wind undercatch measurement error model, it is shown that these northern regions have greatest need for higher-accuracy measurements. Significance Statement The proposed methodology can guide in the optimal placement of precipitation gauges across a large country such as Canada, which will provide value for money in how rain and snow are monitored.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".