MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4317941038 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.107.l020411

Chiral broken symmetry descendants of the kagome lattice chiral spin liquid

2023· article· en· W4317941038 on OpenAlexafffund
Anjishnu Bose, Arijit Haldar, Erik S. Sørensen, Arun Paramekanti

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Condensed Matter Physics
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsChiral symmetry breakingQuantum spin liquidChiral anomalyCondensed matter physicsSymmetry breakingChirality (physics)QuasiparticleLattice (music)T-symmetryHomogeneous spaceQuantum mechanicsSpin (aerodynamics)Nambu–Jona-Lasinio modelElectronFermionSpin polarizationSuperconductivity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The breaking of chiral and time-reversal symmetries provides a pathway to exotic quantum phenomena and topological phases. Recent work has extensively explored the resulting emergence of chiral charge orders and chiral spin liquids (CSLs) on the kagome lattice. Such CSLs are closely tied to bosonic fractional quantum Hall states with anyonic quasiparticles; however, their connection to nearby ordered states has remained a mystery. Here, we use spin-wave theory, parton Gutzwiller wave functions, and exact diagonalization to show that two distinct magnetic orders with uniform scalar chirality---the XYZ umbrella state and the octahedral spin crystal--emerge as competing orders in close proximity to the CSL. In this letter, we highlight the intimate link between a topologically ordered liquid and broken symmetry states with nontrivial real-space topology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicAdvanced Condensed Matter PhysicsFrench-language works237,207