337 Dupilumab treatment is not associated with an increased overall risk of infections in patients aged 6 months to 5 years with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) have an increased risk of infection, including skin infections. Previous studies in children aged 6–11 years and adolescents showed that dupilumab is not associated with an increased risk of overall infections and is associated with a lower incidence of skin infections compared with a placebo. This post-hoc analysis reports the impact of dupilumab treatment on infections, including skin infections, in children aged 6 months to 5 years with moderate-to-severe AD. In LIBERTY AD PRESCHOOL, a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (NCT03346434, part B), children aged 6 months to 5 years with moderate-to-severe AD (Investigator’s Global Assessment score ≥3) were randomized 1 : 1 to subcutaneous dupilumab every 4 weeks (200 mg if baseline weight was ≥5 to <15 kg, 300 mg if weight was ≥15 to <30 kg) or placebo with concomitant low-potency topical corticosteroids for 16 weeks. Exposure-adjusted rates (patients with ≥1 event per 100 patient-years [nP/100 PY]) and systemic anti-infective medication use (nP/100PY) were used to compare treatment groups. 162 patients were randomized to dupilumab (n = 83) or placebo (n = 79). During the 16-week treatment period, total infections rates were numerically lower in the dupilumab-treated group (nP/100PY: 185.2) compared with the placebo-treated group (nP/100PY: 245.7). Fewer infections of skin-structure and soft tissues were reported in the dupilumab group (nP/100PY: 24.7) compared with the placebo group (nP/100PY: 40.2). Dupilumab-treated patients had significantly lower rates of non-herpetic skin infections (nP/100PY: 42.7) than placebo-treated patients (nP/100PY: 92.7; P < 0.05 vs. placebo). There was no significant difference in rates of herpetic skin infections between the dupilumab (nP/100PY: 20.0) and placebo groups (nP/100PY: 17.1; P = 0.817 vs. placebo). No helminthic infections were reported in either group. Systemic anti-infective medication use was significantly less frequent in the dupilumab group (nP/100PY: 104.7) compared with placebo (nP/100PY: 203.0; P < 0.05 vs. placebo). The overall safety of dupilumab was consistent with the known safety profile. Dupilumab treatment is associated with lower overall infections and significantly lower non-herpetic skin infections than placebo in children aged 6 months to 5 years with moderate-to-severe AD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".