MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4318003499 · doi:10.26522/vp.v21i2.4906

Entre fictions autobiographiques et réelles biographies : la mémoire de Tanger selon Elisa Chimenti (1883-1969), une voyageuse atypique

2024· article· fr· W4318003499 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Laurent El Ghaoui

Bibliographic record

VenueVoix Plurielles · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Identity and Heritage
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Première voix féminine de littérature maghrébine d’expression française, Elisa Chimenti (Naples 1883 – Tanger 1969), autrice polyvalente (enseignante, ethnologue, journaliste, écrivaine), a posé un regard rare sur la condition des femmes, les rapports entre Orient et Occident, l’histoire des mythes et légendes et la richesse du patrimoine immatériel marocain. Tangéroise d’adoption, elle a consacré sa vie à la sauvegarde et à la diffusion de ce patrimoine fragile afin de le faire connaître au-delà des préjugés et des frontières. Le roman inédit « Petits Blancs marocains » (1940-1960), à la fois récit historique, de voyage et de formation, illustre de quelle manière Chimenti s’émancipe des modèles de récit viatique au féminin, tout en les revisitant, dans une double autobiographie fictionnelle, où s’entremêlent voyages physiques dans la ville de Tanger et ses alentours et voyages mémoriels en lien avec un groupe d’exilés européens, appelés « Petits Blancs », invisibles ou oubliés, auxquels elle rend hommage à travers une série de portraits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.014
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVoix Plurielles→Same topicCultural Identity and Heritage→French-language works237,207→