MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4318018966 · doi:10.1139/cjfas-2021-0340

Demographic analyses reveal differential biological vulnerability in four Southwestern Atlantic skates

2023· article· en· W4318018966 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Federico Cortés, Jorge H. Colonello, Marina Sammarone, Anabela Zavatteri, Natalia M. Hozbor

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicIchthyology and Marine Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSkateThreatened speciesBiologyFisheryPopulationEcologyFishingOverexploitationHabitat

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

More than 33 skate species have been registered in the Southwestern Atlantic Ocean (SAO) 34°S, where hotspots of the endemic threatened marine chondrichthyans with high scientific and conservation priorities have been detected. The lack of species-specific landing data highlights the importance of biological data-based methods to determine the vulnerability and productivity of skate species. In this work, we estimated the demographic parameters for the skates Atlantoraja castelnaui, Rioraja agassizi, Sympterygia bonapartii, and Zearaja brevicaudata in SAO, by implementing Leslie matrix models. The finite rate of population growth ( ʎ) for the four skate's species ranged from 1.036 ( Z. brevicaudata) to 1.196 ( R. agassizi). Elasticity analyses and the performance of different harvest strategies show that reducing juvenile catches appears to be one of the most effective management actions for these species since they result in higher survivorship of age classes with more influence in λ. Differences in the biological productivity of the skates suggest that, to achieve sustainable exploitation of skates, the commitment of all stakeholders to improve species-level information is necessary.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.077

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic SciencesSame topicIchthyology and Marine BiologyFrench-language works237,207