MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4318034613 · doi:10.1101/2023.01.25.525495

A Distinct Phenotype of Polarized Memory B cell holds IgE Memory

2023· preprint· en· W4318034613 on OpenAlexafffund
Joshua F. E. Koenig, Niels Peter Hell Knudsen, Allyssa Phelps, Kelly Bruton, Ilka Hoof, G. Lund, Danielle Della Libera, Anders Lund, Lars Harder Christensen, David R. Glass, Tina D. Walker, Allison Fang, Susan Waserman, Manel Jordana, Peter S. Andersen

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAllergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityPopulation Health Research Institute
FundersFood Allergy CanadaMcMaster UniversityFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
KeywordsImmunoglobulin EImmunologyCD23AllergenPopulationAllergyAntibodyBiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Allergen-specific IgE antibodies mediate allergic pathology in diseases such as allergic rhinitis and food allergy. Memory B cells (MBCs) contribute to circulating IgE by regenerating IgE-producing plasma cells upon allergen encounter. We report a population of type 2 polarized MBCs defined as CD23 hi , IL-4Rα hi , CD32 low at the transcriptional and surface protein levels. These “MBC2s” are enriched in IgG1 and IgG4-expressing cells, while constitutively expressing germline transcripts for IgE. Allergen-specific B cells from patients with allergic rhinitis and food allergy were enriched in MBC2s. MBC2s generated allergen specific-IgE during sublingual immunotherapy, thereby identifying these cells as the primary reservoir of IgE. The identification of MBC2s provides insights into the maintenance of IgE memory, which is detrimental in allergic diseases, but which could be beneficial in protection against venoms and helminths. One-Sentence Summary Identification of a novel memory B cell subset which holds allergen specific IgE memory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.620
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicAllergic Rhinitis and SensitizationFrench-language works237,207