MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Enhanced ALIVE Mind Controller and Machine Learning to Detect Drowsiness While Driving

2022· article· en· W4318037436 on OpenAlexaff
Jihene Rezgui, Younes Kechout, Félix Jobin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Canadian institutionsCollège de MaisonneuveLaboratoire Recherche Informatique Maisonneuve
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeadsetComputer scienceBluetoothArtificial intelligenceArtificial neural networkSimulationController (irrigation)Real-time computingWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thousands of road accidents occur each year, one of the main causes being drowsiness at the wheel. Therefore, this paper proposes an enhanced scheme called ALIVE Mind to detect drowsy drivers and take action on their car using Machine Learning and EEG. For that matter, we built and designed a circuit board called AMC 2.0 that allows a simple EEG headset to read brain waves from a driver and send this data to a computer via Bluetooth. Those signals are then saved and analyzed by a deep neural network to find if the driver is drowsy or is about to sleep. To evaluate our solution, we conducted simulations and collected brain signals of a subject driver while on a driving simulator. With those values, we were able to train a model to detect whether the subject was drowsy or awake. Finally, when the system detects that the driver is in a fatigued state, it can take control of the car to park it in a safe place. Preliminary results show the effectiveness of the ALIVE Mind project and how it outperforms previous works in terms of minimizing computational needs and improving the prototype's convenience and suitability for car constructors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.858
Threshold uncertainty score0.986

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSleep and Work-Related FatigueFrench-language works237,207