MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4318053665 · doi:10.3390/ijms24032403

The Potential of Dendritic-Cell-Based Vaccines to Modulate Type 3 Innate Lymphoid Cell Populations

2023· article· en· W4318053665 on OpenAlexafffund
Lily Chan, Yeganeh Mehrani, Jessica A. Minott, Byram W. Bridle, Khalil Karimi

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicIL-33, ST2, and ILC Pathways
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Cancer Society Research InstituteCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of Guelph
KeywordsInnate lymphoid cellImmunologyDendritic cellImmune systemAcquired immune systemBiologyImmunotherapyInnate immune systemImmunityVaccinationT cell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dendritic cell (DC) vaccines are a type of immunotherapy that relies on the communication of DCs with other aspects of the immune system. DCs are potent antigen-presenting cells involved in the activation of innate immune responses and education of adaptive immunity, making them ideal targets for immunotherapies. Innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) are relatively newly identified in the field of immunology and have important roles in health and disease. The studies described here explored the communications between type 3 ILCs (ILC3s) and DCs using a murine model of DC-based vaccination. Local and systemic changes in ILC3 populations following the administration of a DC vaccine were observed, and upon challenge with B16F10 melanoma cells, changes in ILC3 populations in the lungs were observed. The interactions between DCs and ILC3s should be further explored to determine the potential that their communications could have in health, disease, and the development of immunotherapies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.237

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Molecular SciencesSame topicIL-33, ST2, and ILC PathwaysFrench-language works237,207