An Enhancement Method Based on Long Short-Term Memory Neural Network for Short-Term Natural Gas Consumption Forecasting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Artificial intelligence models have been widely applied for natural gas consumption forecasting over the past decades, especially for short-term consumption forecasting. This paper proposes a three-layer neural network forecasting model that can extract key information from input factors and improve the weight optimization mechanism of long short-term memory (LSTM) neural network to effectively forecast short-term consumption. In the proposed model, a convolutional neural network (CNN) layer is adopted to extract the features among various factors affecting natural gas consumption and improve computing efficiency. The LSTM layer is able to learn and save the long-distance state through the gating mechanism and overcomes the defects of gradient disappearance and explosion in the recurrent neural network. To solve the problem of encoding input sequences as fixed-length vectors, the layer of attention (ATT) is used to optimize the assignment of weights and highlight the key sequences. Apart from the comparisons with other popular forecasting models, the performance and robustness of the proposed model are validated on datasets with different fluctuations and complexities. Compared with traditional two-layer models (CNN-LSTM and LSTM-ATT), the mean absolute range normalized errors (MARNE) of the proposed model in Athens and Spata are improved by more than 16% and 11%, respectively. In comparison with single LSTM, back propagation neural network, support vector regression, and multiple linear regression methods, the improvement in MARNE exceeds 42% in Athens. The coefficient of determination is improved by more than 25%, even in the high-complexity dataset, Spata.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".