MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4318065841 · doi:10.3389/fped.2023.1055131

Multicenter review of a tadalafil suspension formulation for infants and children with pulmonary hypertension: A North American experience

2023· review· en· W4318065841 on OpenAlexaff
David Youssef, Stephanie S. Handler, Susan Richards, Catherine Sheppard, J Smith, Kathryn Tillman, Matthew Pietrosanu, Edward C. Kirkpatrick, Angela Bates

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Pediatrics · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaStollery Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTadalafilMedicineSildenafilTolerabilityPulmonary hypertensionAdverse effectPediatricsAnesthesiaInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors, with sildenafil the earliest among them, are widely used in the management of pediatric pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Tadalafil is a PDE5 inhibitor with a long half life (16 h), stable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and minimal adverse effects. However, the utility of tadalafil suspensions in this setting has not been widely explored due to a lack of clinical experience. We present a multicenter experience that details the safety and tolerability of a tadalafil suspension, either alone or in combination with another vasodilator, for the management of pediatric pulmonary hypertension (PH). Methods and materials This is a retrospective chart review of infants and children at Children's Wisconsin and the Stollery Children's Hospital enrolled in pediatric PH programs between December 2013 and April 2022 managed with a tadalafil suspension. Patients aged six years of age and under who were treated with a tadalafil suspension were included. Demographics, clinical information, echocardiographic and hemodynamic measurements, and laboratory data were collected before and six months after tadalafil initiation. Results Over the study period, 154 children with a median age of 1.0 (range 0.0–6.9) years were treated with tadalafil therapy. Of these, 39 (25.3%) were in group 1 (PAH), 79 (51.3%) were in group 3 (lung disease), and 33 (21.4%) were in group 5 (pulmonary hypertensive vascular disease). The median initial dose of tadalafil was 1.0 mg/kg once daily. Eleven (7.1%) patients in the cohort were established on tadalafil therapy de novo . The suspension formulation was necessary for 103 (66.9%) patients due to an inability to take enteral tablets and for 49 (31.8%) due to a need for feeding via gastric or jejunal tubes. We observed a statistically significant increase in tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion as well as significant decreases in right-ventricular systolic pressure and NT-proBNP. Tadalafil therapy was well tolerated over the six-month period: at six months, no adverse effects were reported aside from gastrointestinal disturbances by 2 (1.3%) patients. Conclusion Tadalafil, a long-acting PDE5 inhibitor, when administered in a suspension formulation, has a safe and tolerable adverse effect profile. Following six months of therapy, our cohort showed improvements in clinical parameters, echocardiographic measurements, and laboratory results. Patient compliance was good and adverse effects were rare, minor, and manageable with nonpharmacological means.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.602
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in PediatricsSame topicPulmonary Hypertension Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207