Bibliographic record
Abstract
The contemporary period (since 1950) has seen a complete rupture between the Continental and analytic schools in philosophy of music. Continental figures have focused on music’s relationship to its context. Feminists have investigated the impact of oppression of women on music. Analytic philosophers have focused on the relationship between music and emotion, and on how this relationship bears on questions about the value of music. The division between formalists and anti-formalists has persisted into the contemporary period. Questions about the ontology of music have been widely debated. Popular music has received increased attention. Figures discussed include Susan McClary, Heide Göttner-Abendroth, Claude Lévi-Strauss, Jacques Attali, O. K. Bouwsma, John Hospers, Alan Tormey, Nelson Goodman, Peter Kivy, Stephen Davies, David Davies, Malcolm Budd, Andy Hamilton, Jerrold Levinson, Edward T. Cone, Leonard B. Meyer, Jenefer Robinson, Roger Scruton, Kendall Walton, Theodore Gracyk, Andrew Kania, Monroe Beardsley, Gilles Deleuze, Richard Wollheim, Lydia Goehr, Julian Dodd and Nichlas Wolterstorff.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.084 | 0.015 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".