MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4318070508 · doi:10.1183/23120541.00643-2022

Inhaled formoterol impairs aerobic exercise capacity in endurance-trained individuals: a randomised controlled trial

2023· article· en· W4318070508 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Søren Jessen, Anders Krogh Lemminger, Vibeke Backer, Mads Fischer, Andrea Di Credico, Andreas Breenfeldt Andersen, Jens Bangsbo, Morten Hostrup

Bibliographic record

VenueERJ Open Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPharmacological Effects and Assays
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersWorld Anti-Doping AgencyAnti Doping Danmark
KeywordsMedicineFormoterolPhysical therapyAerobic capacityAerobic exerciseEndurance trainingRandomized controlled trialFormoterol FumaratePhysical medicine and rehabilitationInternal medicineAsthma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background The 2022 Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines emphasise the inhaled long-acting β 2 -agonist formoterol as part of the first treatment step, and therefore formoterol use among athletes will probably increase. However, prolonged supratherapeutic use of inhaled β 2 -agonists impairs training outcomes in moderately trained men. We investigated whether inhaled formoterol, at therapeutic doses, imposes detrimental effects in endurance-trained individuals of both sexes. Methods 51 endurance-trained participants (31 male, 20 female; mean± sd maximal oxygen consumption ( V̇ O 2 max ) 62±6 mL·min −1 ·kg bw −1 and 52±5 mL·min −1 ·kg bw −1 , respectively) inhaled formoterol (24 µg; n=26) or placebo (n=25) twice daily for 6 weeks. At baseline and follow-up, we assessed V̇ O 2 max and incremental exercise performance during a bike-ergometer ramp-test; body composition by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; muscle oxidative capacity by high-resolution mitochondrial respirometry, enzymatic activity assays and immunoblotting; intravascular volumes by carbon monoxide rebreathing; and cardiac left ventricle mass and function by echocardiography. Results Compared to placebo, formoterol increased lean body mass by 0.7 kg (95% CI 0.2–1.2 kg; treatment×trial p=0.022), but decreased V̇ O 2 max by 5% (treatment×trial p=0.013) and incremental exercise performance by 3% (treatment×trial p<0.001). In addition, formoterol lowered muscle citrate synthase activity by 15% (treatment×trial p=0.063), mitochondrial complex II and III content (treatment×trial p=0.028 and p=0.007, respectively), and maximal mitochondrial respiration through complexes I and I+II by 14% and 16% (treatment×trial p=0.044 and p=0.017, respectively). No apparent changes were observed in cardiac parameters and intravascular blood volumes. All effects were sex-independent. Conclusion Our findings demonstrate that inhaled therapeutic doses of formoterol impair aerobic exercise capacity in endurance-trained individuals, which is in part related to impaired muscle mitochondrial oxidative capacity. Thus, if low-dose formoterol fails to control respiratory symptoms in asthmatic athletes, physicians may consider alternative treatment options.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.324
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.207
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueERJ Open ResearchSame topicPharmacological Effects and AssaysFrench-language works237,207