MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4318071511 · doi:10.5206/mf.v8i1.15886

Penser le voyage pour panser des mémoires féminines ? Une relecture de Des prénoms comme un chapelet de cauchemars de Marie-Rose Abomo-Maurin

2023· article· fr· W4318071511 on OpenAlex
Léontine Troh-Gueyes

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMouvances Francophones · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration and Exile Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette relecture sous l’angle de la psychanalyse littéraire du recueil de nouvelles d’Abomo-Maurin, Des prénoms comme un chapelet de cauchemars, se propose de cerner ce qui justifie l’obsession du voyage géographique chez les personnages féminins.
 A l’analyse, la quête de thérapie qui s’y dessine, le mode de transport comme une métaphore d’un cabinet analytique et le processus thérapeutique qui s’en suit sont autant de stratégies qui font du voyage finalement non un déplacement dans des ailleurs géographiques mais une bifurcation dans l’intériorité du voyageur. Ainsi, à l’instar d’un thérapeute de l’âme, le voyage permet aux figures périphériques, à l’heure actuelle de la mobilité de s’affranchir des traumatismes antérieurs et de tout entrave à la rencontre de l’altérité et à la construction de nouvelles identités en contexte migratoire.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.396
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it