Using CNN-LSTM Model for Weather Forecasting
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An efficient and cost-effective weather forecasting approach can be used to protect humans and benefit economic growth as a result of secure forest, agriculture, and tourism industry sectors. This paper is based on the IEEE Big Data IARAI’s Weather4cast 2021 challenge dataset. The goal of this paper is to consider computational cost of predicting future weather forecast by using a CNN-LSTM based neural network model. The network utilizes an encoder-decoder architecture to predict future weather images. All the four variables are predicted using the same model providing generalization in the solution. The model is trained and tested on the Nile Region (R1) data and a significant improvement is observed for the loss against cloud mask and rainfall feature prediction in comparison with CNNGRU deep learning model. Two models – shallow and deep models are compared and the results in terms of MSE values for the shallow model (which is computationally cost effective) is not too far from the deep model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it