MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4318157079 · doi:10.11646/phytotaxa.580.1.1

Nomenclator botanicus of Fagaceae in Latin America

2023· article· en· W4318157079 on OpenAlex
Bruce Bartholomew, Frank Almeda

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhytotaxa · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicScarabaeidae Beetle Taxonomy and Biogeography
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFagaceaeBiologyLatin AmericansHomonym (biology)Taxonomy (biology)BotanyEcologyGenus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Latin America is one of the centers of Fagaceae distribution, at least for the genus Quercus. There are a total of 145 Fagaceae species native to Latin America of which 143 are Quercus, with the other two being one species of Fagus and one species of Trigonobalanus. Within Quercus, 32 species that occur in Latin America extend into the United States of America and one, Q. muehlenbergii, ranges as far north as Canada. By far the main center for Quercus in Latin America is Mexico (137 species of which 83 are endemic). The number of species rapidly falls off in Central America, and only one species (Q. humboldtii) occurs in South America (Colombia). In this nomenclator we include one new name (nom. nov.) for a recognized species that was a later homonym when published. We also lectotypify 171 names, and neotypify one species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.101
Threshold uncertainty score0.968

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it