Regulatory mechanisms of the dynein-2 motility by post-translational modification revealed by MD simulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intraflagellar transport for ciliary assembly and maintenance is driven by dynein and kinesins specific to the cilia. It has been shown that anterograde and retrograde transports run on different regions of the doublet microtubule, i.e., separate train tracks. However, little is known about the regulatory mechanism of this selective process. Since the doublet microtubule is known to display specific post-translational modifications of tubulins, i.e., "tubulin code", for molecular motor regulations, we investigated the motility of ciliary specific dynein-2 under different post-translational modification by coarse-grained molecular dynamics. Our setup allows us to simulate the landing behaviors of dynein-2 on un-modified, detyrosinated, poly-glutamylated and poly-glycylated microtubules in silico. Our study revealed that poly-glutamylation can play an inhibitory effect on dynein-2 motility. Our result indicates that poly-glutamylation of the B-tubule of the doublet microtubule can be used as an efficient means to target retrograde intraflagellar transport onto the A-tubule.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".