“Mind Is Revealed in the Countenance”: Subversive Laughter and Caricature in <i>The Woman of Colour</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Throughout The Woman of Colour (1808), Olivia Fairfield, the Black mixed-race heroine, ridicules the “fair sex” bodies of white female characters who irrationally judge the heroine as inferior because of the colour of her skin. In this article, I extend Lyndon J. Dominique’s reading of Olivia’s subversive gaze and laughter found in Imoinda’s Shade (2012). In building on Dominique’s insights, I show how Olivia paradoxically uses caricatural tropes of fat versus thin and young versus old to envision caricature on her own terms: to challenge and resist anti-Black stereotypes. When the novel is examined within the context of contemporary visual caricatures that depict the Black female body as grotesque, one recognizes that Olivia’s defensive use of verbal caricature is a rhetorically strategic attempt to challenge England’s racial hierarchy, by reaffirming her own femininity and “fairness.”
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".