MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Oil Revenue Management: Cameroon’s Experience

2023· book-chapter· en· W4318217781 on OpenAlexaff
Octave Keutiben, Francis Didier Tatoutchoup, Eric Bahel

Bibliographic record

VenueOxford University Press eBooks · 2023
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicNatural Resources and Economic Development
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProsperityCurseTransparency (behavior)RevenueResource curseAccountabilityNatural resourceCorporate governanceContext (archaeology)PoliticsDutch diseaseDevelopment economicsRevenue managementEconomicsBusinessPolitical scienceEconomic growthGeographySociologyFinanceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Cameroon’s growth performance and development outcomes have not hit the level expected from its oil wealth and abundant resources endowments. This chapter first reviews the theory and practice of oil revenue management in the context of developing countries. It then highlights many political economy factors to explain why Cameroon has not harnessed its natural resources, especially oil, for sustained growth and shared prosperity. The chapter underscores that if Cameroon has ever suffered or is suffering from any ‘curse’, it should be referred to as ‘institutional curse’. Most importantly, the chapter asserts that accountability to the people of Cameroon, not donors, is momentous to transparency and good governance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.988
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.143 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOxford University Press eBooksSame topicNatural Resources and Economic DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207