Homeostatic Reinforcement Theory Accounts for Sodium Appetitive State- and Taste-Dependent Dopamine Responding
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Seeking and consuming nutrients is essential to survival and maintenance of life. Dynamic and volatile environments require that animals learn complex behavioral strategies to obtain the necessary nutritive substances. While this has been classically viewed in terms of homeostatic regulation, where complex nutrient seeking behaviors are triggered by physiological need, recent theoretical work proposed that such strategies are a result of reinforcement learning processes. This theory also proposed that phasic dopamine (DA) signals play a key role in signaling potentially need-fulfilling outcomes. To examine potential links between homeostatic and reinforcement learning processes, we focus on sodium appetite as sodium depletion triggers state and taste dependent changes in behavior and DA signaling evoked by sodium-related stimuli. We find that both the behavior and the dynamics of DA signaling underlying sodium appetite can be accounted for by extending principles of homeostatic regulation into a reinforcement learning framework (HRRL). We first optimized HRRL-based agents to model sodium-seeking behavior measured in rats. Agents successfully reproduced the state and the taste dependence of behavioral responding for sodium as well as for lithium and potassium salts. We then show that these same agents can account for the regulation of DA signals evoked by sodium tastants in a taste and state dependent manner. Our models quantitatively describe how DA signals evoked by sodium decrease with satiety and increase with deprivation suggesting that phasic DA signals and sodium consumption are down regulated prior to animals reaching satiety. Lastly, our HRRL agents also account for the behavioral and neurophysiological observations that suggest mice cannot distinguish between sodium and lithium containing salts. Our HRRL agents exhibited an equal preference for sodium versus lithium containing solutions, and underestimated the nutritional value of sodium when lithium was concurrently available. We propose that animals use orosensory signals as predictors of the internal impact of the consumed good and our results pose clear targets for future experiments. In sum, this work suggests that appetite-dirven behavior may be driven by reinforcement learning mechanisms that are dynamically tuned by homeostatic need.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".