MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4318263501 · doi:10.1002/jez.2681

mRNA m<sup>6</sup>A methylation in wood frog brain is maintained during freezing and anoxia

2023· article· en· W4318263501 on OpenAlexafffund
Steven Wade, Hanane Hadj‐Moussa, Kenneth B. Storey

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Experimental Zoology Part A Ecological and Integrative Physiology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA modifications and cancer
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMethylationRNAMessenger RNARNA methylationMethyltransferaseBiologyN6-MethyladenosinemicroRNACell biologyBiochemistryMolecular biologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Freeze tolerance is an adaptive strategy that wood frogs ( Rana sylvatica ) use to survive the subzero temperatures of winter. It is characterized by a variety of metabolic and physiological changes that facilitate successful freezing and anoxia. As both mRNA regulation and posttranslation protein modification have been implicated in freeze tolerance, we hypothesized that posttranslational RNA regulation is also involved in coordinating freeze‐thaw cycles and metabolic rate depression. As such, we investigated the most abundant RNA modification, adenosine methylation (N 6 ‐methyladenosine; m 6 A) in wood frog brains during 24 h periods of freezing and anoxia. This was followed by an examination of levels of RNA methyltransferases, demethyltransferases, and the readers of RNA methylation. Despite relative levels of methylation on mRNA remaining constant throughout freezing and anoxia, a significant increase in relative abundance of m 6 A methyltransferases METTL3 and METTL14 was observed. In addition, we investigated the effect of m 6 A RNA methylation on mRNA triaging to stress granules and report a significant increase in stress granule markers TIAR and TIA‐1 in both freezing and anoxia. Our findings are the first report of RNA posttranslational regulation during metabolic rate depression in the wood frog brain and suggest that the dynamic RNA methylation observed is not directly linked to mRNA regulation during periods of extreme metabolic reorganization, warranting future investigations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.260
Threshold uncertainty score0.509

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Experimental Zoology Part A Ecological and Integrative PhysiologySame topicRNA modifications and cancerFrench-language works237,207