mRNA m<sup>6</sup>A methylation in wood frog brain is maintained during freezing and anoxia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Freeze tolerance is an adaptive strategy that wood frogs (Rana sylvatica) use to survive the subzero temperatures of winter. It is characterized by a variety of metabolic and physiological changes that facilitate successful freezing and anoxia. As both mRNA regulation and posttranslation protein modification have been implicated in freeze tolerance, we hypothesized that posttranslational RNA regulation is also involved in coordinating freeze‐thaw cycles and metabolic rate depression. As such, we investigated the most abundant RNA modification, adenosine methylation (N6‐methyladenosine; m6A) in wood frog brains during 24 h periods of freezing and anoxia. This was followed by an examination of levels of RNA methyltransferases, demethyltransferases, and the readers of RNA methylation. Despite relative levels of methylation on mRNA remaining constant throughout freezing and anoxia, a significant increase in relative abundance of m6A methyltransferases METTL3 and METTL14 was observed. In addition, we investigated the effect of m6A RNA methylation on mRNA triaging to stress granules and report a significant increase in stress granule markers TIAR and TIA‐1 in both freezing and anoxia. Our findings are the first report of RNA posttranslational regulation during metabolic rate depression in the wood frog brain and suggest that the dynamic RNA methylation observed is not directly linked to mRNA regulation during periods of extreme metabolic reorganization, warranting future investigations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".