Monitoring of Microbial Safety of Foods Using Lectins: A Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Food-borne diseases are on the rise, and these will likely continue as a public health concern into the coming decades. Majority of foodborne outbreaks are linked to infections by emerging foodborne pathogens such as Campylobacter, Salmonella, Listeria monocytogenes, and Escherichia coli O157:H7. Foodborne pathogen identification becomes crucial in such scenarios to control these pathogens, associated outbreaks, and diseases. Pathogen detection systems have evolved as essential food safety tools to combat microbial threats and experts are striving to develop robust, accurate and ergonomic rapid pathogen-detection kits. Lectin, a ubiquitous biomolecule (sugar binding proteins) present in almost all domains of life is a promising alternative to molecular based methods as a bio-recognition molecule in detection of foodborne pathogens for biosensor applications, owing to its multivalency and spatial organization of ligands. Due to their extensive prevalence, lectin-based biosensors have become the most sought-after bio-recognition molecules in biosensor applications because of increased sensitivity and reduced cost when compared to immune-based biosensors. The current paper discusses the claimed benefits of lectin as a superior bio-recognition molecule, as well as its numerous applications in biosensor creation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".