THE ACADEMY OF FINE ARTS GARDEN IN THE SYSTEM OF ACADEMIC QUARTER PUBLIC SPACES: CHAPTERS OF HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT PROSPECTS
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article presents the first ever analysis of the Academic Garden as part of the system of public spaces in the Academy of Fine Arts quarter. The role of the Academic Garden in the visual and spatial perception of the architectural composition of the Academy of Fine Arts building in St. Petersburg is considered. Based on archival documents, many of which are published for the first time, the historical evolution of the architectural and landscape composition of the Academic Garden is retraced. The functioning and operation of the garden at different times is analyzed. A question is raised about the degree to which the garden in its current condition meets the needs of St. Petersburg Academy of Fine Arts. Preferred lines of further harmonious development of the Academic Garden are identified.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it