Spontaneous activity in cortical neurons is stereotyped and non-Poisson
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neurons fire even in the absence of sensory stimulation or task demands. Numerous theoretical studies have modeled this spontaneous activity as a Poisson process with uncorrelated intervals between successive spikes and a variance in firing rate equal to the mean. Experimental tests of this hypothesis have yielded variable results, though most have concluded that firing is not Poisson. However, these tests say little about the ways firing might deviate from randomness. Nor are they definitive because many different distributions can have equal means and variances. Here, we characterized spontaneous spiking patterns in extracellular recordings from monkey, cat, and mouse cerebral cortex neurons using rate-normalized spike train autocorrelation functions (ACFs) and a logarithmic timescale. If activity was Poisson, this function should be flat. This was almost never the case. Instead, ACFs had diverse shapes, often with characteristic peaks in the 1-700 ms range. Shapes were stable over time, up to the longest recording periods used (51 min). They did not fall into obvious clusters. ACFs were often unaffected by visual stimulation, though some abruptly changed during brain state shifts. These behaviors may have their origin in the intrinsic biophysics and dendritic anatomy of the cells or in the inputs they receive.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".