MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4318372800 · doi:10.1039/bk9781849738958-00006

Fat Nanostructure

2014· book-chapter· en· W4318372800 on OpenAlexaff
Chloe M. O′Sullivan, Nuria C. Acevedo, Fernanda Peyronel, Alejandro G. Marangoni

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood Chemistry and Fat Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrystallizationCrystal (programming language)NanostructureMelting pointMoleculeCrystal structureCharacterization (materials science)Materials scienceNetwork structureChemistryCrystallographyNanotechnologyOrganic chemistryComputer scienceDistributed computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fat is made up of a mixture of triacylglycerol molecules (TAGs) – three fatty acids esterified to a glycerol backbone. The solid material is structured by a fraction of high melting point TAGs, which form a crystal network that traps the low melting TAGs within. Characterization of that crystal network is an important tool to understand fat properties and functionality. This chapter will cover fat crystal structure using a bottom-up approach, from TAG molecules to space-filling network. Emphasis will be on the fat crystal nanoscale, a level which was recently isolated and characterized, and how nano-sized crystalline structures fit into the larger network. Finally, the effect of composition and crystallization conditions on crystal structure and bulk physicochemical properties will be examined, to understand how processing conditions can be used to target functionality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.111

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.025

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.168
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFood Chemistry and Fat AnalysisFrench-language works237,207