MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4318389353 · doi:10.29173/writingacrossuofa41

Writing is an Interactive Process.

2023· article· en· W4318389353 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zhuoxin Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueWriting across the University of Alberta · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLiteracy and Educational Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWriting processProcess (computing)MoodThe InternetComputer scienceLife writingWorld Wide WebInternet privacyPsychologyMultimediaArtLiteratureSocial psychologyMathematics educationNarrative

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Writing is the interaction between an individual's life and the objective world. Nowadays, with the Internet and mobile phones, people write all the time, but they are getting away from actual writing. Writing isn't just random posts on Twitter or Instagram that follow your mood, but a process that needs to interact with life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.095

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.010
Scholarly communication0.0110.007
Open science0.0010.011
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWriting across the University of AlbertaSame topicLiteracy and Educational PracticesFrench-language works237,207