Structure–transport correlations in Na11Sn2SbSe12 and its sulfide solid solutions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report a new ion conductor—Na11Sn2SbSe12—as a possible candidate for a solid catholyte in composite cathodes for all-solid state Na-batteries, which exhibits a room temperature ionic conductivity of 0.15 ± 0.03 mS cm−1 and an activation energy of 0.39 ± 0.02 eV. The sulfide solid solutions of Na11Sn2SbSe12, namely, Na11Sn2SbS12−xSex (x = 1 and 6), were also investigated through a combination of Rietveld refinement against powder x-ray diffraction data and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy to reveal the complex structure–property relationships governing ion transport in this class of materials. Meanwhile, broadening of the Na-ion diffusion pathways in Na11Sn2SbSe12 is expected to facilitate Na-ion transport compared to the sulfide-rich member of the solid solution, the opposite holds: increasing the Se fraction in Na11Sn2SbS12−xSex leads to a little change in the activation energy but a reduction in the ionic conductivity. We ascribe this to the lowering of the prefactor, σ0, in the Arrhenius relationship with increasing lattice “softening” as a function of higher Se content.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".