MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4318426814 · doi:10.1353/cj.2023.0015

Lindsay McIntyre: Indigenous Handmade Cinema

2023· article· en· W4318426814 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kristin L. Dowell

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of cinema and media studies · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArtistic and Creative Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMovie theaterFilmmakingFilm directorIndigenousFilm industryVisual artsMateriality (auditing)ArtHistorySociologyArt historyMedia studiesAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lindsay McIntyre: Indigenous Handmade Cinema Kristin L. Dowell (bio) There is always the mark of me as a maker in my works. —Lindsay McIntyre1 Lindsay McIntyre is an award-winning analog experimental filmmaker of Inuit and Scottish heritage who has made over forty short films in the last twenty years. She has contributed a body of knowledge to the practice of silver gelatin emulsion for motion picture film. In this essay, I explore how her analog filmmaking practice indigenizes handmade cinema as she breaks settler colonial silences to recuperate her Inuit matrilineal family history through film. Making her own film stock is an act of creative sovereignty and a way to reclaim 16mm film from the apparatus of the film industry while exerting control over the means of production. This is an especially powerful and salient reclamation given the long history of misrepresentation and extractive practices of the dominant film industry with regard to Indigenous stories and knowledge. There is a rich materiality to her films as her high-contrast 16mm film stock shows textures and marks of her own hand while also bearing the traces of the environmental conditions under which the film footage was shot including on her traditional territory in Qamani’tuaq (Baker Lake), Nunavut. I argue that McIntyre’s inventive celluloid-based [End Page 183] artistic practice reveals 16mm film to be a dynamic and vibrant medium that speaks to an Indigenous creative resurgence while reflecting Inuit principles around resourcefulness and innovation. McIntyre’s commitment to analog practices as a maker of emulsions has deepened the global movement of artist-driven, experimental, and handmade cinematic practice as well as Indigenous film practice. There are other Indigenous filmmakers who utilize 16mm film, such as Alexandra Lazarowich for Lake (2019), Rhayne Vermette for the feature film Ste. Anne (2021), and Alanis Obomsawin for her vast filmography, including the groundbreaking film Kanehsatake: 270 Years of Resistance (1993). That McIntyre was the cinematographer for Lake and was one of five cinematographers for Ste. Anne speaks to her prominence within the Indigenous film world, where she’s known for her exceptional skill with 16mm. Many other filmmakers rely on commercially made 16mm film and commercial labs for film processing (instead of hand-processing their own film as McIntyre often does). Their films have also been produced on a larger scale and with the support of the National Film Board of Canada or other national film funding agencies and institutions. McIntyre was first trained in painting and drawing, and she turned to filmmaking with a creative interest in pushing the material limits of film itself. In an interview she explains, “I came to film from drawing and scratching on the film to seeing what I could do to change its physical properties and push up against boundaries.”2 She is part of a wider artist movement of process cinema and handmade cinema. Film scholars Scott MacKenzie and Janine Marchessault define process cinema as “a creative tradition in alternative filmmaking that is unscripted, improvisational, participatory, and based on the manipulation of the very materiality of film.”3 McIntyre’s interest in pushing the limits of the material possibilities of film align her within the community of non-commercial, experimental, and avant-garde filmmakers who have utilized 16mm film as their artistic materials. What differentiates McIntyre’s filmmaking practice is her engagement with these materials through her unique visual sensibilities, which are informed by her learned and embedded Inuit values, and narratives that privilege Inuit stories. While experimental filmmakers have long utilized 16mm film, there are far fewer filmmakers who make their own emulsions. This is a very time-consuming and labor-intensive process that McIntyre first became involved with as a response to Kodak’s abrupt discontinuance of her favorite film stock. The short documentary Handmade Film (Christina Ienna, 2017) is a compelling portrait of McIntyre’s process in which she notes that it often takes her three days to make an emulsion resulting in a medium-sized batch of about five hundred feet of film, with thirty or forty feet being used to test while the remaining footage contains about nine to thirteen minutes of actual film time available for a...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.120
Threshold uncertainty score0.306

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.130
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of cinema and media studiesSame topicArtistic and Creative ResearchFrench-language works237,207