MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4318445553 · doi:10.47925/2009.388

Nonviolent Consciousness and the Pedagogy of Peace: Further Territories to Explore

2009· article· en· W4318445553 on OpenAlex
Daniel Vokey

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhilosophy of education · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPeace and Human Rights Education
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHarmOppressionNormalization (sociology)IdeologyPerceptionConsciousnessSociologyStatus quoEpistemologySocial psychologyCriminologyPolitical sciencePsychologyLawPoliticsSocial sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

alert us to how education commits pedagogical violence through dysconsciousness, arrogant perception, and normalization.By pedagogical violence they mean the serious harm we cause when we assume that our beliefs represent the whole truth, thereby erasing the insights of people who see things from other points of view.Mistaking partial knowledge for complete knowledge causes moral as well as epistemological harm when dominant perspectives function ideologically to legitimate structural and other systemic forms of oppression, in part by concealing how members of dominant groups both maintain and also benefit from the unjust status quo.Dysconsicousness, arrogant perception, and normalization also cause serious harm when the perspectives rendered invisible are wholly or partially constitutive of the subjectivities of people, whose existence is thereby denied recognition in the public sphere.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.345
Threshold uncertainty score0.176

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it