MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4318475237 · doi:10.33140/jpnb.08.01.01

Enuresis: Nocturnal Enuresis and Diurnal Enuresis

2023· article· en· W4318475237 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Faith Chemutai, Joseph Kisakye, Agapitus Kato, Fredrick Kabbale, Anthony Egeru

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pediatrics & Neonatal Biology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMalaria Research and Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInternational Development Research Centre
KeywordsIndoor residual sprayingMalariaToxicologyAnophelesBiologyBed netsVector (molecular biology)Veterinary medicineMedicinePlasmodium falciparum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The American Pediatric Academy proposed the acceptable definition of enuresis as, the involuntary wetting of clothes or bedding by urine during the daytime or nighttime. The main reasons of enuresis are delay in central nervous system maturation, under capacitated bladder, abnormalities of the urinary tract, nocturnal insufficient antidiuretic hormone secretion and psychogenic factors. Mothers of pediatric with enuresis observed a lower quality of life, in terms of anxiety and depression, more stress and more intensity of pain than mothers of healthy pediatric. Nocturnal enuresis is characterized as the symptoms of intermittent urinary incontinence during sleep, at a minimum age of five yrs, with a minimum duration of three months, and a minimum of one episode per month. Nocturnal enuresis (night time wetting) is more common in boys. Diurnal enuresis can be characterized as unintended urination in a pediatric old enough to have develop control or uncontrolled passing of urine that occurs after age of five yrs and also when a child who is toilet trained has wetting accidents during the day. Diurnal enuresis (daytime wetting (functional daytime urinary incontinence)) is more common in girls.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.433
Threshold uncertainty score0.664

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pediatrics & Neonatal BiologySame topicMalaria Research and ControlFrench-language works237,207