Wnt/β-catenin pathway inhibitors, bone metabolism and vascular health in kidney transplant patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Sclerostin, dickkopf-related protein 1 (DKK1), fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF23) and α-klotho have been shown to play an important role in bone and vascular disease of chronic kidney disease. We aimed to evaluate the evolution of these bone markers in newly kidney transplanted patients, and whether they are associated with bone metabolism and vascular stiffness. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS AND MEASUREMENTS: This is a longitudinal single-center observational cohort study. Circulating levels of Wnt/β-catenin pathway inhibitors (sclerostin, DKK1, FGF23 and α-klotho), arterial stiffness (carotid-femoral pulse-wave velocity (PWV), carotid-radial PWV, PWV ratio, augmented index) and bone parameters were assessed before (M0), and at 3 (M3) and 6 months (M6) after transplantation. Generalized estimating equations were conducted for comparative analyses between the three time points. We used a marginal structural model for repeated measures for the impact of changes in bone markers on the evolution of arterial stiffness. Multivariate linear regression analyses were performed for the associations between Wnt/β-catenin pathway inhibitors and mineral metabolism parameters. RESULTS: We included 79 patients (70% male; median age of 53 (44-60) years old). The levels of sclerostin (2.06 ± 1.18 ng/mL at M0 to 0.88 ± 0.29 ng/mL at M6, p ≤ 0.001), DKK1 (364.0 ± 266.7 pg/mL at M0 to 246.7 ± 149.1 pg/mL at M6, p ≤ 0.001), FGF23 (5595 ± 9603 RU/mL at M0 to 137 ± 215 RU/mL at M6, p ≤ 0.001) and α-klotho (457.6 ± 148.6 pg/mL at M0 to 109.8 ± 120.7 pg/mL at M6, p < 0.05) decreased significantly after kidney transplant. Sclerostin and FGF23 were positively associated with carotid-femoral (standardized β = 0.432, p = 0.037 and standardized β = 0.592, p = 0.005) and carotid-radial PWV (standardized β = 0.259, p = 0.029 and standardized β = 0.242, p = 0.006) throughout the 6 months of follow-up. The nature of the associations between bone markers and bone metabolism parameters varies after kidney transplant. CONCLUSIONS: The circulating levels of Wnt/β-catenin pathway inhibitors and α-klotho significantly decrease after kidney transplantation, while sclerostin and FGF23 levels might be associated with improvement of vascular stiffness and blood pressure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".