Heterogeneous Graph Transformer for Meta-structure Learning with Application in Text Classification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The prevalent heterogeneous Graph Neural Network (GNN) models learn node and graph representations using pre-defined meta-paths or only automatically discovering meta-paths. However, the existing methods suffer from information loss due to neglecting undiscovered meta-structures with richer semantics than meta-paths in heterogeneous graphs. To take advantage of the current rich meta-structures in heterogeneous graphs, we propose a novel approach called HeGTM to automatically extract essential meta-structures (i.e., meta-paths and meta-graphs) from heterogeneous graphs. The discovered meta-structures can capture more prosperous relations between different types of nodes that can help the model to learn representations. Furthermore, we apply the proposed approach for text classification. Specifically, we first design a heterogeneous graph for the text corpus, and then apply HeGTM on the constructed text graph to learn better text representations that contain various semantic relations. In addition, our approach can also be used as a strong meta-structure extractor for other GNN models. In other words, the auto-discovered meta-structures can replace the pre-defined meta-paths. The experimental results on text classification demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach to automatically extracting informative meta-structures from heterogeneous graphs and its usefulness in acting as a meta-structure extractor for boosting other GNN models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".