Closed-loop vasculature network design for bioprinting large, solid tissue scaffolds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vascularization is an indispensable requirement for fabricating large solid tissues and organs. The natural vasculature derived from medical imaging modalities for large tissues and organs are highly complex and convoluted. However, the present bioprinting capabilities limit the fabrication of such complex natural vascular networks. Simplified bioprinted vascular networks, on the other hand, lack the capability to sustain large solid tissues. This work proposes a generalized and adaptable numerical model to design the vasculature by utilizing the tissue/organ anatomy. Starting with processing the patient's medical images, organ structure, tissue-specific cues, and key vasculature tethers are determined. An open-source abdomen magnetic resonance image dataset was used in this work. The extracted properties and cues are then used in a mathematical model for guiding the vascular network formation comprising arterial and venous networks. Next, the generated three-dimensional networks are used to simulate the nutrient transport and consumption within the organ over time and the regions deprived of the nutrients are identified. These regions provide cues to evolve and optimize the vasculature in an iterative manner to ensure the availability of the nutrient transport throughout the bioprinted scaffolds. The mass transport of six components of cell culture media-glucose, glycine, glutamine, riboflavin, human serum albumin, and oxygen was studied within the organ with designed vasculature. As the vascular structure underwent iterations, the organ regions deprived of these key components decreased significantly highlighting the increase in structural complexity and efficacy of the designed vasculature. The numerical method presented in this work offers a valuable tool for designing vascular scaffolds to guide the cell growth and maturation of the bioprinted tissues for faster regeneration post bioprinting.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".