MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4318542631 · doi:10.1111/nan.12886

A non‐hemispheric transtentorial <i>ZFTA</i> fusion‐positive ependymoma in a 6‐month‐old boy

2023· article· en· W4318542631 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Antonello Cardoni, Sabina Barresi, Eleonora Piccirilli, Viola Alesi, Evelina Miele, Isabella Giovannoni, Silvia Genovese, Giada Del Baldo, Francesca Diomedi‐Camassei, Manila Antonelli, Felice Giangaspero, Chiara Puggioni, Andrea Carai, Giovanna Stefania Colafati, Angela Mastronuzzi, Marco Gessi, Rita Alaggio, Sabrina Rossi

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuropathology and Applied Neurobiology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistry of Health, British Columbia
KeywordsRaw dataEpendymomaMicroarray analysis techniquesDNA methylationFusion geneMedicineComputer scienceBioinformaticsInformation retrievalComputational biologyBiologyGenePathologyGeneticsGene expressionProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

None of the authors declares conflicts of interest. The peer review history for this article is available at https://publons.com/publon/10.1111/nan.12886. DNA methylation raw data have been deposited in NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus (GSE220932). NGS data and chromosomal microarray analysis data are available on request from the authors. Data S1: Supporting Information Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuropathology and Applied NeurobiologySame topicCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207