Prácticas de liderazgo escolar en Andalucía moderadas por dimensión organizativa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Es conocido el papel fundamental del liderazgo en el impulso de la innovación educativa para atender al reto de una sociedad global y cambiante. El Modelo de Liderazgo d Ontario (MLO) es un enfoque comprensivo que propone prácticas de liderazgo adaptables a los cambios. Sin embargo, los resultados heterogéneos del modelo según el tipo de centro escolar hacen necesarios los estudios que muestren su funcionamiento controlando el contexto organizativo. Se utilizó una muestra de representantes de los equipos directivos de centros escolares de Andalucía, se buscó comprender las relaciones entre los componentes del MLO como estructura útil para el desarrollo de "buenas prácticas docentes”, controlando el tipo de centro. Se realizó un modelaje de ecuaciones estructurales multigrupo y se comprobó que la dimensión organizativa modera la estructura de las relaciones del modelo. Este estudio aporta evidencias empíricas que pueden ser útiles para el desarrollo del modelo en distintos contextos escolares.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".