MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4318561820 · doi:10.1016/j.scr.2023.103037

Generation of four myotonic dystrophy type 1 patient iPSC lines (CBRCULi002-A, CBRCULi003-A, CBRCULi004-A, CBRCULi005-A) and a control (CBRCULi001-A) derived from lymphoblastoids cell lines

2023· article· en· W4318561820 on OpenAlexafffund
Dominic Jauvin, Marion Pierre, Mohamed Boutjdir, Jack Puymirat, Mohamed Chahine

Bibliographic record

VenueStem Cell Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalInstitut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Québec
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéU.S. Department of Defense
KeywordsMyotonic dystrophyBiologyMuscular dystrophyMyotoniaKaryotypeInduced pluripotent stem cellGeneNeuromuscular diseaseMyocyteGeneticsMolecular biologyCell biologyDiseaseInternal medicineChromosomeEmbryonic stem cell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Myotonic dystrophy Type 1 (DM1) is a severe inherited neuromuscular disease and is the most prevalent form of muscular dystrophy in adults. DM1 involves not only the striated muscles including skeletal, and cardiac but also other organs such as the eye, brain and gonads. We have generated and characterized 4 adult heterozygous DM1 iPSC lines carrying between 1300 and 1600 CTG repeat expansion in the DM1 protein kinase gene, and a control from an apparently healthy individual. They all show strong pluripotency markers, differentiation capacity, the absence of residual viral vectors as well as normal karyotypes and colony morphologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.134
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStem Cell ResearchSame topicGenetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesFrench-language works237,207