MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4318577146 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac190.0636

P506 Endoscopic and clinical outcomes of upadacitinib in patients with moderate to severe Crohn’s disease by baseline disease severity

2023· article· en· W4318577146 on OpenAlexaff
Britta Siegmund, Kamal Patel, Esther A. Torres, Péter L. Lakatos, Jakob Benedict Seidelin, Mark R. Fleisher, Sharanya Ford, V Remple, Ana P. Lacerda, S. Anyanwu, A Garrison, Julián Panés

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineGastroenterologyCrohn's diseasePlaceboPost-hoc analysisDiseaseClinical trialAbdominal painColonoscopySurgeryColorectal cancerPathologyCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Upadacitinib (UPA) is an oral selective Janus kinase inhibitor with demonstrated efficacy in induction and maintenance treatment of Crohn’s disease (CD). This post hoc analysis assessed the efficacy of UPA in patients with CD by baseline (BL) disease severity. Methods In the U-EXCEL (NCT03345849) and U-EXCEED (NCT03345836) induction studies, patients with moderate-to-severe CD and intolerance/inadequate response to biologic therapy (both studies) and/or conventional therapy (U-EXCEL) received UPA 45 mg once daily (QD) or placebo (PBO) for 12 weeks. Patients who achieved clinical response to UPA induction were re-randomised in a maintenance study (U-ENDURE, NCT03345823) to receive UPA 15 mg QD, UPA 30 mg QD, or PBO for 52 weeks. Clinical remission and endoscopic response were evaluated in subgroups stratified by BL disease characteristics: Crohn’s Disease Activity Index (CDAI), very soft/liquid stool frequency (SF), abdominal pain score (APS), and Simple Endoscopic Score for CD (SES-CD). Patients from the U-EXCEL and U-EXCEED studies were pooled for analysis. Results Among 1021 patients with moderate-to-severe CD (UPA 45 mg, n=674; PBO, n=347), week 12 clinical remission and endoscopic response rates were significantly higher for patients receiving UPA 45 mg vs PBO regardless of BL disease severity (nominal P <.01), except SES-CD <6 (UPA, n=35; all had ileal disease only per the inclusion criteria) (Figure 1). UPA efficacy rates were higher compared with PBO across BL CDAI, with variable treatment effects. Patients with lower BL SF achieved clinical remission and endoscopic response with UPA 30 mg at higher rates than those with higher BL SF at week 12 and week 52. At week 12, the absolute efficacy rates and treatment differences for clinical remission and endoscopic response were generally similar across BL APS. Patients with higher BL SES-CD (≥15) generally achieved higher rates of clinical remission and endoscopic response at week 12 with UPA vs PBO than those with lower BL SES-CD (6–14). At week 52, clinical remission and endoscopic response rates were generally higher for patients receiving UPA vs PBO and most were consistent with a dose-response relationship (Figure 2). Generally, larger treatment differences between UPA and PBO were observed for patients with the most severe disease per SES-CD. Conclusion UPA induction and maintenance therapy improved clinical and endoscopic outcomes vs PBO in patients with moderate-to-severe CD, across levels of disease severity. Data for the small subgroup of patients with SES-CD <6 should be interpreted cautiously given lower mucosal healing rates in isolated ileal CD.1 Reference: 1. Atreya R, et al.Curr Res Pharmacol Drug Discov. 2022;3:100097.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→