P297 The Toronto IBD Global Endoscopic Reporting (TIGER) Score and its Ability to Predict Outcomes Regarding Steroid and Biologic Use in Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn’s Disease Patients – A Construct Validation Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background The recently developed TIGER endoscopy score was established to reliably describe disease severity as it can be utilized for both Ulcerative Colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD) patients.1The aim of this prospective study was to assess the TIGER score’s ability to predict UC and CD patient outcomes including biologic and steroid use. Methods A cohort of 78 patients with UC (n=40) and CD (n=38) were included in a 52-week multiple visit prospective study. Each visit included patient interviews using the IBD disk questionnaire, blood draws for C-reactive protein (CRP), and fecal calprotectin (FC). Endoscopy assessment was performed at baseline. Administration of steroids, immunomodulators (IMN), biologics, and dose escalations were recorded. Baseline total TIGER scores were dichotomized as <100 points (remission-mild endoscopic activity) or ≥100 points (moderate-severe endoscopic activity) as a predictor of therapeutic outcomes. Results At baseline, compared to patients with TIGER scores <100, UC patients with TIGER scores ≥100 had significantly higher CRP (p<0.0005), FC (p<0.0001), and IBD disk (p<0.0001). In CD patients, at baseline, compared to patients with TIGER scores <100, patients with TIGER scores ≥100 had significantly higher CRP (p<0.0006), FC ( p<0.006), and IBD disk ( p<0.0001). At 52-weeks, compared to patients with baseline TIGER scores <100, UC and CD patients with baseline TIGER scores ≥100 had a significantly increased likelihood of requiring steroids as therapy (p<0.0001). Specifically, 7.1% and 0% of UC and CD patients with baseline TIGER scores <100 required steroids compared to 73.1% and 48.3% of UC and CD patients with baseline TIGER scores ≥100, respectively. Moreover, at 52-weeks, compared to patients with baseline TIGER scores <100, UC and CD patients with baseline TIGER scores >100 both had a significantly increased likelihood of being prescribed or having to subsequently escalate biologic therapy (p<0.0001). More specifically, 7.1% and 11.1% of UC and CD patients with baseline TIGER scores <100 required biologic therapy compared to 92.3% and 100% of UC and CD patients with baseline TIGER scores ≥100, respectively. Conclusion The TIGER endoscopy score demonstrates significant association with CRP, FC and IBD disk in UC and CD patients. Moreover, the TIGER endoscopy score can be utilized as a measure to predict the likelihood of UC and CD patients with moderate-to-severe disease burden requiring certain therapeutic interventions. These data suggest that the TIGER score reflects disease burden and the subsequent need for pharmacologic intervention in both UC and CD patients. 1. Zittan E, et al. J Crohns Colitis 2022;16:544-553.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".