Feasibility of Dynamic Inhaled Gas MRI-Based Measurements Using Acceleration Combined with the Stretched Exponential Model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dynamic inhaled gas (3He/129Xe/19F) MRI permits the acquisition of regional fractional-ventilation which is useful for detecting gas-trapping in lung-diseases such as lung fibrosis and COPD. Deninger’s approach used for analyzing the wash-out data can be substituted with the stretched-exponential-model (SEM) because signal-intensity is attenuated as a function of wash-out-breath in 19F lung imaging. Thirteen normal-rats were studied using 3He/129Xe and 19F MRI and the ventilation measurements were performed using two 3T clinical-scanners. Two Cartesian-sampling-schemes (Fast-Gradient-Recalled-Echo/X-Centric) were used to test the proposed method. The fully sampled dynamic wash-out images were retrospectively under-sampled (acceleration-factors (AF) of 10/14) using a varying-sampling-pattern in the wash-out direction. Mean fractional-ventilation maps using Deninger’s and SEM-based approaches were generated. The mean fractional-ventilation-values generated for the fully sampled k-space case using the Deninger method were not significantly different from other fractional-ventilation-values generated for the non-accelerated/accelerated data using both Deninger and SEM methods (p > 0.05 for all cases/gases). We demonstrated the feasibility of the SEM-based approach using retrospective under-sampling, mimicking AF = 10/14 in a small-animal-cohort from the previously reported dynamic-lung studies. A pixel-by-pixel comparison of the Deninger-derived and SEM-derived fractional-ventilation-estimates obtained for AF = 10/14 (≤16% difference) has confirmed that even at AF = 14, the accuracy of the estimates is high enough to consider this method for prospective measurements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".