MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4318601202 · doi:10.36901/em.v3i1.109

El desarrollo de la creatividad emocional en los docentes: conectando la teoría con la práctica

2019· article· es· W4318601202 on OpenAlexaff
Annemarie Cuculiza Brunke

Bibliographic record

VenueEducationis Momentum · 2019
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Teacher Training
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present article investigates the formative aspects that contributed (or inhibited) the development of the emotional creativity of three elementary school teachers in Lima, Peru. This paper analyzes the data of one of the participants, Súper Keka, which was the pseudonym she created for herself, as part of the creative process. Based on different creativity theories useful in the educational practice, a phenomenological approach encompasses autobiographical work, using arts-based methods (particularly collage inquiry) as one of the main vehicles for the investigation. This study suggests the importance of collaborative work to promote the transformation of rigid thought paradigms, that are—to an extent—structural, due to the own formative experience of the educators. The, so called, education for the 21st century, demands a substantial revolution of teaching and learning, understanding that the role of the educator is now to awaken and nurture the capacity to learn of learners. To do so, it is necessary that educators revise their own formative experience, learning to un-learn. In this amazing journey of self-discovery, Emotional Creativity is a straightforward and flexible system to develop the aspects that will allow us to transform the current dominant paradigms and develop our resilience and ability to adapt to change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.680
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.349 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEducationis MomentumSame topicEducation and Teacher TrainingFrench-language works237,207