MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Beta-Liouville and Inverted Beta-Liouville Based Predictive Models for Occupancy Detection using Small Training Data

2022· article· en· W4318606478 on OpenAlex
Jiaxun Guo, Manar Amayri, Wentao Fan, Nizar Bouguila

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Surveillance and Tracking Methods
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBETA (programming language)Computer scienceTraining setGaussianFlexibility (engineering)Alpha (finance)Artificial intelligenceGaussian processMixture modelMachine learningPattern recognition (psychology)AlgorithmMathematicsStatisticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose two predictive models based on Beta-Liouville (BL) and inverted Beta-Liouville (IBL) mixture models. The choice of the BL and IBL mixture models is motivated by their flexibility. The proposed predictive models are dedicated to classification tasks where the training datasets are non-Gaussian and small which is generally the case in real-life scenarios. A principled variational approach is proposed to learn the proposed models. Extensive experimental results based on both synthetic data and a real application that concerns occupancy detection in smart buildings prove that our predictive framework achieves promising results especially with extremely small training data sets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.818
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.165
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it