MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4318620238 · doi:10.33182/ml.v20i1.2856

The Politics of Migration: A Function of Discursive Rights, Integration, and Justice

2023· article· en· W4318620238 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMIGRATION LETTERS · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Refugees, and Integration
Canadian institutionsSaint Paul University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsEconomic JusticeImmigrationDemocracyDilemmaSociologyPolitical scienceGlobal justiceHuman rightsForced migrationLiberalismLaw and economicsMedia studiesLawPolitical economyRefugee

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Book Reviews: The Politics of Migration: A Function of Discursive Rights, Integration, and Justice Demanding Rights: Europe’s Supranational Courts and the Dilemma of Migrant Vulnerability. By Moritz Baumgärtel. Cambridge University Press, 2019. 206pp. ISBN 9781108677837 Justice for People on the Move: Migration in Challenging Times. By Gillian Brock. Cambridge University Press, 2020. 256pp. ISBN 9781108774581 Transitional Justice and Forced Migrations: Critical Perspectives from the Global South. Edited by Nergis Canefe. Cambridge University Press, 2019. 330pp. ISBN 9781108380072 Migration and Integration: The Case for Liberalism Without Borders. By Tom Fraser. Cambridge University Press, 2020. 272pp. ISBN 9781108757997 The Perpetual Immigrant and the Limits of Athenian Democracy. By Demetra Kasimis. Cambridge University Press, 2018. 206pp. ISBN: 9781107280571 Reviewed by Philip Onguny

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.681
Threshold uncertainty score0.959

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it