MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4318620238 · doi:10.33182/ml.v20i1.2856

The Politics of Migration: A Function of Discursive Rights, Integration, and Justice

2023· article· en· W4318620238 on OpenAlexaff
Philip Onguny

Bibliographic record

VenueMIGRATION LETTERS · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Refugees, and Integration
Canadian institutionsSaint Paul University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsEconomic JusticeImmigrationDemocracyDilemmaSociologyPolitical scienceGlobal justiceHuman rightsForced migrationLiberalismLaw and economicsMedia studiesLawPolitical economyRefugee

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Book Reviews: The Politics of Migration: A Function of Discursive Rights, Integration, and Justice Demanding Rights: Europe’s Supranational Courts and the Dilemma of Migrant Vulnerability. By Moritz Baumgärtel. Cambridge University Press, 2019. 206pp. ISBN 9781108677837 Justice for People on the Move: Migration in Challenging Times. By Gillian Brock. Cambridge University Press, 2020. 256pp. ISBN 9781108774581 Transitional Justice and Forced Migrations: Critical Perspectives from the Global South. Edited by Nergis Canefe. Cambridge University Press, 2019. 330pp. ISBN 9781108380072 Migration and Integration: The Case for Liberalism Without Borders. By Tom Fraser. Cambridge University Press, 2020. 272pp. ISBN 9781108757997 The Perpetual Immigrant and the Limits of Athenian Democracy. By Demetra Kasimis. Cambridge University Press, 2018. 206pp. ISBN: 9781107280571 Reviewed by Philip Onguny

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.008
Scholarly communication0.0080.006
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMIGRATION LETTERSSame topicMigration, Refugees, and IntegrationFrench-language works237,207