La voce “sull’orlo della notte.” Milo De Angelis e Stéphane Mallarmé
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Con la poesia moderna l’immagine onirica e il sogno di un’unità nuova, fortemente presenti nel Romanticismo, sfociano spesso nel quadro della lacerazione e dell’impossibilità della notte. Dal punto di vista filosofico tale tendenza viene rappresentata da Maurice Blanchot che nel saggio Lo spazio letterario propone una distinzione tra prima e altra notte. Il suo modello risulta direttamente applicabile all’opera di Stéphane Mallarmé, considerando soprattutto l’ottica di Igitur. L’articolo si propone di esaminare tale aspetto, mettendolo in contrasto con la poesia contemporanea di Milo De Angelis, l’autore che esordisce nel 1976 con Somiglianze, opponendosi in modo esplicito al mallarmeano “sogno” della purezza. Nelle sue raccolte, la notte viene tendenzialmente riscoperta attraverso la dimensione lirico-tragica. Un’analisi contrastiva di questi approcci permette di definire il senso profondo delle immagini notturne, ma anche i prerequisiti necessari perché esse si realizzino, indipendentemente dalle distanze poetiche.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".